Module 5: Creating Assignments

The learning activities that you designed around the learning resources that you selected for students to learn the course content comprise the formative assessment component of your course. In this module, we will focus on designing assignments, which are part of the summative assessment component of your course.

Objectives

After working on this module, you should be able to:

  1. Explain the purpose of assignments;
  2. Describe different types of assignments;
  3. Plan the assignments that are appropriate for your course; and
  4. Write effective assignment guides.

Nature and Purpose of Assignments

Assignments, like examinations, are course activities that are designed to “sum up student achievement at a particular point in time” (Victoria Department of Education and Early Childhood Development, 2013). As a form of summative assessment, assignments require students to integrate what they have learned about a set of topics, and to demonstrate multi-domain and higher-level learning. In addition, student performance in assignments is formally evaluated and given marks or scores that are included in the computation of the student’s final grade for the course.

Assignments can be contrasted with formative learning activities and exercises that are focused on specific topics and where student performance is assessed by teachers in an informal way throughout the course. In UPOU courses, assignments and examinations comprise the key course requirements that students must fulfill in order to pass the course.

Types of Assignments

Assignments in tertiary-level or college-level courses (whether undergraduate or graduate) typically take the form of reports or research papers, case studies, critical essays, proposals, and multimedia projects such as video productions and slide presentations.

Different disciplines have their own preferred assignment types and it is expected that the assignments you set for your course result in ‘knowledge products’ that are expected of students in your discipline.

However, the following guidelines for creating assignments from the Carnegie Mellon Eberly Center cut across disciplines and should be borne in mind when planning assignments:

  1. Consider your learning objectives and ensure that assignments are aligned with these learning objectives.
  2. Design assignments that are interesting and challenging.
  3. Name assignments accurately.
  4. Sequence assignments such that they build skills in a logical manner.
  5. Consider how much time each assignment will require and the spacing of assignments throughout the term.
  6. Check the feasibility of each assignment.
  7. Articulate the task description clearly.
  8. Establish clear performance criteria.
  9. Specify the intended audience of the assignment output.
  10. Specify the purpose of the assignment.
  11. Specify the parameters for the assignment.

Activity 5-1

  1. Read the guidelines for creating assignments provided by the Carnegie Mellon Eberly Center at http://www.cmu.edu/teaching/assessment/assesslearning/creatingassignments.html.
  2. With the guidelines for creating assignments in mind, plan what assignments you will require in your course. Use the table below to plan these assignments.
Assignment Name Module/s Covered Course Objective/s Covered Due Date
       
       
       
       

In deciding on the total number of assignments, keep in mind that assignments are supposed to be integrative/summative in nature. They are also not the only form of summative assessment that you might include in your course. If your course includes examinations (e.g. a mid-term and a final examination), this will impact on how many assignments can be reasonably required of students to complete within the term.

As an additional note on types of assignments, at UPOU assignments are also sometimes classified into 1) assignments to be marked by the faculty-in-charge, called faculty-marked assignments or FMAs; and 2) assignments to be marked by tutors, called tutor-marked assignments or TMAs.

Writing the Assignment Guide

An assignment guide is a document that gives students detailed guidance on what an assignment requires. It specifies the assignment number and title or name, and includes the following specifications:

  1. Submission date
  2. Task
  3. Procedures or specific guidelines to be followed
  4. Evaluation criteria

Submission date. It is important to clearly stipulate in the assignment guide when an assignment is due. This will help students to schedule work on the assignment vis-à-vis other course work as well as their non-course-related work.

Task. This is a clear and concise description of the learning task and the expected final output or product.

Procedures or specific guidelines. This consists of the steps that students should follow in accomplishing the assignment.

Evaluation criteria. This indicates in the form of a scoring guide or rubric how assignment submissions will be evaluated.

The assignment guide can also specify the following:

  • The percentage of the final grade the assignment will account for
  • A definition of terms used especially in the task overview
  • A list of tools and resources to be used in completing the assignment

Activity 5-2

For each assignment that you have planned for your course (in Activity 5-1), write an assignment guide. Refer to Annex 5-1 for an example of an assignment guide.

Annex 5-1 Sample Assignment Guide

 

EDDE 201 – Foundations of Distance Education
Term: January – March AY2013-2014

Guidelines for Assignment 1

Date due: 1 February 2014

Percent equivalent of final grade: 20%

Task
Write an essay of not more than 1,500 words applying the theoretical concepts
of distance education (DE) discussed in the readings for Module 4 to your
personal experience of DE and/or your observations of the experience of
others.

Definition of terms
A “DE experience” may be any of the following:

  • Your experiences as a DE student (not necessarily in EDDE 201) during a specific period (e.g. in a previous term, the first few weeks of the current term)

  • A brief exchange or dialogue or conversation with a teacher or fellow learner about DE and/or in a DE setting

  • A DE reading experience: what you did and felt and thought while reading a DE module or reading and/or while researching the module topic further

  • The decision-making process that culminated in you opting to enroll in a DE program

A “DE experience” may also be any combination of the above.

Specific guidelines

  1. Begin with a clear and concise description of the DE experience being analyzed. The description must provide the relevant details but it must be brief and to the point. Overall, the description of your DE description must not exceed a third of your essay in length. OR since you might have to substantiate your analysis by referring to specific details of your DE experience, limit your initial presentation/description of your DE experience to perhaps a quarter or a fifth of the length of your essay.
  2. Analyze your DE experience using any relevant combination of theoretical concepts in DE from the readings (i.e., the journal articles and book chapters posted on the course site) for Module 4. In general, this analysis would answer questions like: When viewed through the theoretical lenses provided by the module readings, what interpretation or analysis of your DE experience might be made? What insights into your DE experience have you gained from the readings
  3. In your analysis, show or demonstrate a clear and adequate understanding of the theoretical concepts (including how they are related) you have chosen. Provide clear, concise, and coherent explanations of these theoretical concept/s. Do not take the concepts out of context. And do not assume that your reader will know what you are talking about without sufficient explanation from you.
  4. Demonstrate how the theoretical concepts you have chosen apply to your DE experience. Remember that you are making an analytic interpretation that is not necessarily obvious to your reader. Present a logical argument or case for the relevance of your chosen theoretical concepts to your DE experience.
  5. You may consult/refer to scholarly references/articles other than those provided in the course site. However, be sure that your references are reliable. Ideally, you should use the articles authored by the proponents of the concepts taken up.
  6. Write coherently and grammatically. Remember that you are writing an essay, the parts of which should flow logically into each other.
  7. Provide a short title for your essay. Put the title (in boldface) at the top of page 1, just above the first paragraph of your essay. Do NOT include a separate title page, and do NOT include an abstract.
  8. Use proper in-text referencing and include a list of references used using the APA format (see http://linguistics.byu.edu/faculty/henrichsenl/apa/apa01.html and http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/). Avoid any and all forms of plagiarism.
  9. Your assignment should be an MS Word document (.doc) with the following name: YourSurnameFirstLetterofFirstName_Assignment1.doc. For example: CruzJ_Assignment1.doc Do NOT submit your assignment in portable document format (PDF). Observe the following formatting guidelines: Font size and type: 12 points Times New Roman Paper size and margins: A4 paper with one-inch margins all around Line spacing: singe spacing between lines but double spacing between paragraphs
  10. Post/Upload your assignment on the Assignment 1 submission bin on the course site.
  11. Submit your assignment on or before the date due. For each day of delay beyond this deadline, a 0.25 deduction will be made from the assignment’s final grade. For example, if your assignment merits a grade of 1.0 but you submitted it five days after the date due, the final grade for the assignment will be 2.25.
  12. You will be given formative feedback, as well as an opportunity to revise your assignment (within a specific time frame) if necessary. However, the requisite deduction for a delayed submission of the first version of the assignment will be applied to the final grade for the assignment.

Evaluation criteria

Use the evaluation criteria below as a checklist for ensuring that you meet the assignment requirements before you submit your assignment.

  1. Is your account of your DE experience clear and concise?
  2. Do you use the relevant theoretical concept/s in your analysis?
  3. Do you demonstrate a good understanding of these theoretical concepts? Are you not misinterpreting them?
  4. Is your account/explanation of the theoretical concepts in the course of your analysis clear and accurate?
  5. Is your analysis logical and coherent? Does each thought/idea logically lead to the next? Do you make use of the appropriate transition signals? Have you avoided leaps in logic?
  6. Is your analysis insightful? Does it go beyond a superficial application of theoretical concepts? Does it clarify the theoretical concepts applied and help readers appreciate/understand them better?
  7. Is your analysis complete? Are there no gaps in your analysis?
  8. Have you avoided making direct quotes that do not add value to your analysis? Do you quote only where needed?
  9. Have you observed proper referencing, including making in-text citations for statements and ideas from others (and not just direct quotations)? Have you avoided both advertent and inadvertent forms of plagiarism?
  10. Are all of your references relevant and credible (i.e. they are not propaganda or advertising material; they are based on research or sound theoretical analysis; they have not been proven false or discredited by scholars)?
  11. Do you have a complete list of references used and in the correct format?
  12. Is your assignment written grammatically?
  13. Have you observed the word limit?